Transmission of Toxocara canis via Ingestion of Raw Cow Liver: A Cross-Sectional Study in Healthy Adults

Article information

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The life cycle of Toxocara canis, a common round worm residing in the small intestine of dogs, is complex. Infection of dogs occurs by ingestion of eggs that are passed in the feces and contained in soil. The ingested embryonated eggs hatch in the stomach and small intestine, and the larvae liberate. The larvae invade the intestinal mucosa, enter into the mesenteric and portal veins, reach the liver, and then pass to the lungs. From the lungs, some larvae pass through the bronchioles, trachea, and pharynx, and are swallowed and develop into adults in the small intestine. Other larvae, from the lungs, are carried to the heart and are distributed throughout the body by systemic circulation, mainly to the lungs, liver, kidneys, and muscles. The larvae can be transferred to pups through transplacental circulation or transmammary passage through milk during lactation [1-4].

Toxocara spp. are capable of infecting other animals. As in infection of dogs, infection to other animals takes place by ingestion of egg-contaminated soil in dooryards and parks. The infected larvae, which are 0.5 mm long, reach the liver, may become encapsulated, and dormant in the liver parenchyma, and move slowly from place to place (i.e., visceral larva migrans), or may migrate to the lungs and may continue to be distributed in other tissues [2,3]. These arrested larvae in animal tissues do not grow into an adult ascarid, but are capable of transmitting to other animals that eat the infected tissue harboring the encapsulated larvae. This mode of transmission among carnivous vertebrates has been experimentally established [4-8]. If these animals form a part of the food chain of the definitive host, i.e., dogs and cats, the life cycle of the parasite is completed. This phenomenon is called paratenic infection [1]. A large variety of non-canid animals may be infected. For T. canis, the known paratenic hosts include mice, rats, chickens, pigeons, lambs, pigs, and cows. Thus, animals are infected by ingestion of embryonated eggs in contaminated soil or by ingestion of encapsulated larvae in the tissues of paratenic hosts through cannibalism.

As in animals, human infection occurs in 2 ways; by ingestion of embryonated eggs or, alternatively, by transfer of the encapsulated larvae of T. canis in the tissues of a paratenic host to humans [1]. In certain ethnic groups, some adults tend to eat uncooked animal tissues that contain encapsulated infective larvae. After swallowing, the encapsulated larvae hatch in the small intestine, liberate and penetrate the intestinal wall, get into the portal vein and reach the liver and lungs, and again encapsulate and remain alive for a certain period. Uncooked livers of cows [8-11], pigs [12], lambs [13], and chickens [14,15] have been reported as the sources of human infections. A recent retrospective study with Korean patients with peripheral blood eosinophilia showed that a recent history of eating raw cow liver was related to an increased risk of toxocariasis [16]. However, epidemiological data on the role of ingestion of raw cow liver in the transmission of T. canis from animals to humans is limited, and there has been no explicitly designed study. In order to assess the role of eating raw cow liver for human infection of T. canis, we performed a cross-sectional study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Sixty-eight (79.1%) of 86 seropositive adults for T. canis had a recent history of ingestion of raw cow liver within 1 year, while 29 (45.3%) of 64 seronegative adults had a history of raw cow liver ingestion. Ten adults ate raw livers of animals other than cows, such as pigs (n=7), dogs (n=3), goats (n=2), chickens (n=2), ducks (n=1), or geese (n=1).

Table 1 presents the distribution of the 86 seropositive adults and 64 negative adults for the Toxocara ELISA. According to multivariate analyses, a recent history of ingestion of raw cow liver was related to an increased risk of toxocariasis (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.9-10.2; P=0.001). A history of keeping dogs also showed an increased risk of toxocariasis (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.6; P=0.022). A recent history of ingestion of raw liver of other animals, raw meat of animals, raw blood of animals, raw freshwater fish, and the serologic results for other parasites were not related with the increased risk of toxocariasis.

Table 1.

Distribution of 86 positive and 64 negative adults for Toxocara as determined by ELISA and corresponding P-values and OR with 95% CI, according to histories of ingestion of raw animals and fish, the history of keeping a dog, and serological results for other parasites

DISCUSSION

Chops of raw cow liver is one of the popular dishes in Korea, served in meat restaurants or buffet restaurants, sometimes along with chops of raw cow meat. Chops of raw liver and meat are served together with the usual cooked or barbecued meats. Some people believe that raw liver or raw meat is good for health, particularly the raw liver for eyesight. In our study population, about 2/3 (64.7%, 97 of 150) of adults had an experience of ingestion of raw cow liver. In the Korean society, some people eat chops of raw cow liver frequently when they dine at meat restaurants. Not infrequently, raw livers of chickens, goats, pigs, ducks, geese, or rabbits are also consumed. Because of this eating habit, there are many patients with subclinical toxocariasis. Usually, these people are checked by clinicians because of eosinophilia [10] or sometimes because of incidentally found small nodular lesions in the liver and/or lungs as seen on radiological imaging, such as sonography or CT [9].

The results of our study suggest that ingestion of raw cow liver substantially increases the risk for infection with T. canis. The seropositive rate for T. canis in adults that ate raw cow liver (70.1%, 68 of 97) was more than 2 times higher than in adults that did not consume raw cow liver (34.0%, 18 of 53). In a retrospective study with Korean patients with peripheral blood eosinophilia, 87.5% of seropositive patients had a recent history of eating raw cow liver, and 25.0% of seronegative patients had this history [16]. In 20 individuals that ate raw cow liver frequently (4 times or more per year), the seropositive rate was 95.0% (19 of 20). In 35 individuals that ate raw cow liver within 6 months prior to the interview, the seropositive rate was 94.3% (33 of 35). It appeared that the seropositive rate was higher in people with a history of ingestion of raw cow liver frequently and recently.

In spite of being seropositive for T. canis, 18 (20.9%) of 86 individuals denied a history of ingestion of cow livers. Ingestion of raw livers of pigs, lambs, and chickens have been reported as routes of human infections. We attempted to establish a role of eating habits of raw animal livers other than cows, such as goats, chickens, pigs, ducks, or geese for T. canis infection. There were 10 seropositive individuals with a history of consuming raw livers of other animals, but they had a history of ingestion of cow livers as well. Therefore, we could not verify the relation between ingestion of raw livers of other animals and toxocariasis.

Five of 18 subjects that denied a history of ingestion of cow livers were keeping dogs; 2 dogs lived in the house and the other 3 dogs lived in gardens. Infection might take place by ingestion of T. canis eggs that were spread by the dogs. In our study, the history of keeping dogs was statistically significant with T. canis infection. However, a retrospective study with Korean patients with peripheral blood eosinophilia could not show that the history of keeping dogs was related to an increased risk of toxocariasis [16].

In another 7 subjects who were seropositive without a history of raw cow liver ingestion, infection might have occurred by ingestion of raw cow meat. There have been several case reports describing Toxocara infection that probably took place by ingestion of raw meat of animals [18,19]. In animal experiments, Toxocara larvae were recovered in the lungs, liver, kidneys, brain, and muscles [8,20]. Tahira et al. [7] suggested the possibility of zoonotic risk of T. canis infection through ingestion of animal meat. In our study, many adults (84.5%, 82 of 97) that ate raw cow liver also ate raw cow meat. Therefore, we could not make a differentiation of subjects infected with Toxocara through ingestion of raw cow liver from subjects infected through ingestion of raw cow meat.

We do not know the route of T. canis infection in 6 individuals. We could not exclude the possibility of toxocariasis by other Toxocara spp., such as T. cati. Also, there may be cross reactions with other helminthiasis, such as trichinosis, fascioliasis, and strongyloidiasis.

T. canis seropositive rates in general population are variable depending on the country. The rate has been reported as 18% in a rural area in China [21], 20% in Malaysia [22], 26% in Iran [23], 6-36% in the Czech Republic [24], 2-5% and 14-37% in urban and rural areas of the Midi-Pyrenees area in France [25], 5% in Switzerland [26], and 5% in a rural area in Korea [27]. As dogs and cats are popular pets, there is widespread contamination of the environment with infective stage eggs and, therefore, toxocariasis is a worldwide disease, irrespective of developed or developing countries. In a total of 150 subjects enrolled in this study, 86 (57.3%, 86 of 150) were T. canis seropositive. Considering the seroprevalence rate in a rural population in Korea (5%), the seropositive rate in this study was very high. Higher seroprevalences have been reported in Indonesia (68%) [28] and Nepal (81%) [29]. Fan et al. [12] assumed that the high seroprevalence among healthy adults of Taiwanese aboriginal populations (46%) was due to the habit of eating raw liver of wild boar. The population enrolled in this study were healthy subjects who voluntarily visited the clinic for health screening. Therefore, these people were relatively wealthy and they dine at meat restaurants more frequently than other people, and they might have had more chances to consume raw cow livers.

Our study had some limitations. The study was of a cross-sectional nature and thus temporal associations could not be inferred. Therefore, we could not ascertain the inconsistency between seronegative subjects and remote infection by ingestion of raw cow livers. A bias arising from recall data based on the ability of an individual to recall the history of ingestion of raw tissue of animals could not be avoided. We did not count the number of chops of animal tissues ingested in determining the seropositivity of the enrolled participants. The study population might not be a representative of the general population as a nurse interviewer chose the participants randomly by selecting those subjects who responded voluntarily. Finally, positive results of ELISA do not definitely mean T. canis infection. Its sensitivity and specificity are around 90% [17].

With the limitations of the study in mind, we again suggest that ingestion of raw cow liver and keeping dogs increases the risk of T. canis infection in Korea. In view of many adults with subclinical toxocariasis, ingestion of uncooked livers of paratenic hosts is an important source for human infections that cannot be ignored.

Article information Continued