Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Development of a Disperse Dye Immunoassay Technique for Detection of Antibodies against <i xmlns="">Neospora caninum</i> in Cattle

Development of a Disperse Dye Immunoassay Technique for Detection of Antibodies against Neospora caninum in Cattle

Article information

Korean J Parasito. 2013;51(1):129-132
Publication date (electronic) : 2013 February 18
doi : https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2013.51.1.129
1Islamic Azad University of Jahrom, Jahrom, Iran.
2Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Shiraz, Iran.
Corresponding author (namavari@yahoo.com)
Received 2012 April 19; Revised 2012 October 02; Accepted 2012 October 04.

Abstract

In this study a disperse dye immunoassay method was standardized and evaluated for detection of antibodies against Neospora caninum in cattle. Sera from 150 cattle with a recent history of abortion were collected and tested by commercial ELISA kit and a standardized in-house dye immunoassay system. The positivity rate for the sera used in this study was 34.6% for the disperse dye immunoassay (DDIA) compared to 32% obtained by ELISA kit. This study showed no significant difference between DDIA and ELISA. The results indicated that the DDIA provide an economic, simple, rapid and robust test for detection of N. caninum infection in cattle.

The protozoan parasite Neospora caninum is a major cause of abortion in cattle worldwide [1,2]. N. caninum was first diagnosed in litter of dogs in Norway in 1984 [3]. It has been found in various animal species such as dogs, cattle, horses, sheep and goats [4]. The diagnosis of neosporosis can be confirmed by immunohistochemical identification of parasite in tissue sections and by demonstration of specific antibodies in serum. Several assays are available for detecting antibodies to N. caninum in cattle, which are mainly based on detecting antibodies against tachyzoite antigens [4]. The IFAT (Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test) has been used in surveys for antibody detection raised against N. caninum in dog. Although IFAT is a specific test, but it is time consuming when a large number of sera is being analyzed [5,6]. ELISA (Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay) also is known as a sensitive and specific technique for serological surveys [7-9], however, this test requires an equipped laboratory, with proper instruments and trained technicians. In contrast, colloidal dye immunoassay provides an economic, simple and rapid approach for the immunoassay, and does not require specialized training or equipment. Moreover, the components are stable without any need for refrigeration [10-13]. In this study, an indirect dye test was developed to analyze antibodies against N. caninum in cattle.

Blood samples were collected from a total of 150 cows with a history of abortion in different period of pregnancy from different dairy farms. Serum samples were stored at -20℃ until use. The N. caninum NC-1 isolate, was obtained from Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Shiraz, Iran, which was cultured in Vero cell line with fresh DMEM medium (Sigma Co., USA) and 2% fetal calf serum. DMEM medium was supplemented with an antibiotic/antimycotic solution, containing Penicillin (10,000 U/ml), Streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and Amphotericin B (25 µg/ml) (Invitrogen, USA). The cells were incubated with 5% CO2 and observed daily. Tachyzoites were harvested when more than 80% of the Vero cells were infected. Then the suspended parasites were pelleted by centrifugation with 1,800 g for 15 min and passed through a 27-gauge needle to rupture the host cells. Finally, the tachyzoites were separated from the host cell debris by centrifugation in a 40% Percoll density gradient. Cell-free tachyzoites were pelleted (800 g for 20 min), washed three times in PBS, resuspended in sterile distilled water, and sonicated for six 30-s pulses (MSE Soniprep 150, SANYO, Japan). Cell debris and intact cells were removed by centrifugation (1,000×g for 20 min at 4℃) [14,15]. Disperse dye, BLUE SP (DNBS), was provided from DA-YU Chemical Co. (Taiwan ROC). Rabbit anti-bovine IgG was purchased from Sigma. A nonenzymatic detection reagent was prepared by conjugation of anti-bovine IgG antibody to colloidal dye particles as described previously [16]. Dye particle suspensions were prepared using a washing/centrifugation procedure. The concentration of dye in the aqueous solution used for antibody conjugation was monitored at its optimum wavelength (λ max) and expressed as the multiples of dye concentration corresponding to an A (absorbance at λ max)=1. To determine optimum concentration; various concentrations were tested. Ten µg of the antibody per one milliliter dye was mixed and shaken in a 37℃ incubator for 1 hr. The antibody and colloidal dye conjugate was stored at 4℃ until use. To optimize the DDIA, dye-antibody conjugates (various ratios of dye and rabbit anti-bovine antibody) were used to detect the antibody presence in the bovine's sera in order to select the most effective combinations of dye and secondary antibody. To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, parallel test was applied to compare the results of DDIA and ELISA kit (iscom ELISA kit, Svanova Biotech AB, Sweden). The procedures of antibody detection using DDIA are described as follow. The nitrocellulose membrane was divided into 3 segments for suspected serum, positive and negative control 2 µl of N.caninum soluble antigen was dotted on suspected and 2 µl of uninfected Bovine serum was dotted on positive control segment of nitrocellulose membrane. Dots were allowed to dry on the NC strips. The non specific binding sites on the NC surface were blocked with 2% BSA for 1 hr and then washed 3 times with tween 20 solution in PBS (0.5 ml Tween-20 per 1 L PBS). The strips were placed in serum samples which were diluted 1:50 with PBS for 1 hr. The strips were then washed 3 times with PBS tween 20 and were put in dye/antibody reagent for 45 min. The blue color dot on suspected segments was considered as positive.

To determine the optimal conditions, various dye concentrations were used to link the dye and antibodies in the conjugation procedure. The optimum concentration was A (λ max) =15. The procedure of dye-antibody conjugation should be carefully optimized to achieve high sensitivity and specificity in the assay. According to our results the pH values around 7 the temperature at 37℃ and the dyeing incubation time of 30 min were the most suitable conditions for dyed-antibody preparation. Out of 150 field serum samples collected from cattle, 39 (26%) were positive in DDIA and ELISA tests and 91(66.6%) were negative in both tests. The kappa statistic and apparent correlation rate were used to measure the strength of agreement between the results of the tests by the ELISA and DDIA. A kappa statistic value of >0.75 represents excellent agreement between the results [17]. In the method we used in our study good agreement (Kappa=0.697) between the prevalence estimated by the DDIA and ELISA tests was found (Table 1).

The comparison of DDIA and ELISA for the detection of antibodies against N. caninum in cattle

Due to the fact that N. caninum is closely related to Toxoplasma gondii and the potential cross-reaction might occur the DDIA was evaluated by using 5 bovine confirmed T. gondii seropositive samples previously diagnosed by ELISA and IFA tests. The result of DDIA showed no cross reaction with bovine Toxoplasma positive sera.

N. caninum is associated with abortion and reproductive loss in cows worldwide. Hence researchers have developed a number of diagnostic tests to investigate the epidemiology of infection and disease. The different type of ELISA techniques are mostly used world-wide for the diagnosis of Neospora infection in cattle [18,19]. Despite the high specificity and sensitivity of microplate ELISA tests, the use of these methods requires an ELISA reader which is an expensive instrument which is not available in many underdeveloped areas of the world. Moreover, ELISA procedure is time consuming, requires technical skills and experience to run. In contrast, the DDIA requires only non-expensive commercially available materials and reagents with long half-lives and the test can be assessed visually [20]. Serological investigation for several infection agents was recently accomplished using a dipstick colloidal dye immunoassay [21-26]. The dipstick dye is a variation of labeled immunoassay that uses nitrocellulose membrane as a support and colloidal dye as the label for the rapid reaction of Ag and Ab. In this study, a DDIA strip test for the detection of N. caninum infection in cattle was developed. We successfully applied the blue color colloidal dye particles to label rabbit anti-bovine IgG to detect IgG antibodies against N. caninum. Comparing the developed DDIA with commercial ELISA kit, there was no significant difference between the two tests, but the DDIA was faster and much easier to perform than the commercial ELISA kit and also more suitable for use in the field. The dye antibody suspension, with dye concentration at A (λmax)=15 giving the highest color intensity without background was chosen. It is suggested that at a lower dye concentration, only little amount of immuno-protein were dyed which resulted in a lower color intensity on the strip. On the other hand, at a higher dye concentration the epitopes of the antibody might be shielded by dye molecules which cause antibody inactivation. Also, in the higher dye concentrations, the aggregation of dyed-antibody may occur, which could result in background of NC membrane during the assay process [28]. It is also observed that higher color intensities were obtained when dyeing was conducted with a longer incubation time. The DDIA which utilize rabbit anti bovine IgG-colloidal dye conjugates as a visualizing agent may also be used for detection of specific antibodies in other infectious diseases with specific detectable antigens. The DDIA was also associated with other advantages such as easy conjugate preparation and test performance. Where costs are an issue, and in the absence of more elaborated diagnostic tests in many developing countries, simple tests such as DDIA could still deliver reliable information that could monitor individuals and/or herds infected with N. caninum. To our best knowledge this is the first report of DDIA for the detection of N. caninum.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Razi serum and vaccine research institute and Jahrom Azad University.

References

1. Reiterova K, Pilovska S, Antolova D, Dubinsk P. Neospora caninum, potential cause of abortions in dairy cows: the current serological follow-up in Slovakia. Vet Parasitol 2009;159:1–6. 19019551.
2. Dubey JP, Vianna MCB, Kwok OCH, Hill DE, Miska KB, Tuo W, Velmurugan GV, Conors M, Jenkins MC. Neosporosis in Beagle dogs: Clinical signs, diagnosis, treatment, isolation and genetic characterization of Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 2007;149:158–166. 17890012.
3. Bjerkas I, Mohn SF, Presthus J. Unidentified cyst-forming-sporozoon causing encephalomyelitis and myositis in dogs. Z Parasitenkd 1984;70:271–274. 6426185.
4. Dubey J, Schares G. Diagnosis of bovine neosporosis. Vet Parasitol 2006;140:1–34. 16730126.
5. Bjorkman C, Uggla A. Serological diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection. Int J Parasitol 1999;29:1497–1507. 10608435.
6. Packham A, Sverlow K, Conrad PA, Loomis EF, Rowe JD, Anderson ML, Marsh AE, Cray C, Barr BC. A modified agglutination test for Neospora caninum: Development, optimization, and comparison to the indirect fluorescent-antibody test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1998;5:467–473. 9665950.
7. Baszler TV, Knowles DP, Dubey JP, Gay JM, Mathison BA, Mcelwain TF. Serological diagnosis of bovine neosporosis by Neospora caninum monoclonal antibody-based competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:1423–1428. 8735092.
8. Fisa R, Gallego M, Riera C, Aisa MJ, Valls D, Serra T, de Colmenares M, Castillejo S, Portus M. Serologic diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis by dot-ELISA. J Vet Diagn Invest 1997;9:50–55. 9087925.
9. Baszler T, Adams S, Vander-Schalie J, Mathison B, Kostovic M. Validation of a commercially available monoclonal antibody-based competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of serum antibodies to Neospora caninum in cattle. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3851–3857. 11682497.
10. Xiang X, Tianping W, Zhigang T. Development of a rapid, sensitive, dye immunoassay for schistosomiasis diagnosis: a colloidal dye immunofiltration assay. J Immunol Methods 2003;280:49–49. 12972187.
11. Mistrello G, Gentili M, Falagiani P, Roncarolo D, Riva G, Tinelli M. Dot immunobinding assay as a new diagnostic test for human hydatid disease. Immunol Lett 1995;47:79–85. 8537105.
12. Rabello AL, DiasNeto E, Garsia MM, Katz N. Dot-dye immunoassay for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis mansoni. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1992;87:187–190. 1308563.
13. Snowden K, Hommel M. Antigen detection immunoassay using dipsticks and colloidal dyes. J Immunol Methods 1991;140:57–65. 2061614.
14. Bjorkman C, Lunden A, Holmdahl J, Barber J, Trees AJ, Uggla A. Neospora caninurn in dogs: detection of antibodies by ELISA using an iscom antigen. Parasite Immunol 1994;16:643–648. 7708430.
15. Trees AJ, Guy F, Tennant BJ, Balfour AH, Dubey JP. Prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in a population of urban dogs in England. Vet Rec 1993;132:125–126. 8447050.
16. Gribnau T, Van Sommeren A, Van Dinther F. In : Chaiken M, ed. DIA disperse immunoassay. Affinity Chromatography and Biological Recognition 1983. Orlando: Academic Press. p. 375–380.
17. Enoe C, Georgiadis MP, Johnson WO. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Prev Vet Med 2000;45:61–81. 10802334.
18. Liu J, Yu J, Wang M, Liu Q, Zhang W, Deng C, Ding J. Serodiagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in cattle using a recombinant tNcSRS2 protein-based ELISA. Vet Parasitol 2007;143:358–363. 16989950.
19. Bjorkman C, Holmdahl OJ, Uggla A. An indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for demonstration of antibodies to Neospora caninum in serum and milk of cattle. Vet Parasitol 1997;68:251–260. 9066070.
20. Wan Omar A, Low CK, Vivian JG, Sulaiman O, Yusof S. A colorimetric dipstick colloidal dye immunoassay for rapid diagnosis of active cases of canine dirofilariasis. Asian Pac J Mol Biol Biotech 1998;6:41–46.
21. Jin S, Chang ZY, Ming X, Li MC, Wei H, You SL, Xiao HG. Fast dipstick dye immunoassay for detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies of human toxoplasmosis. Clin diagn lab immunol 2005;12:198–201. 15643007.
22. Gasem MH, Smits HL, Goris MGA, Dolman MV. Evaluation of a simple and rapid dipstick assay for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in Indonesia. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:173–177. 11865843.
23. Kashiwazaki Y, Kanitpun R, Suteeraparp P, Boonchit S. A preliminary comparative study of a dipstick colloidal dye immunoassay and two antigen-detection ELISAs for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection in cattle. Vet Res Commun 2000;24:533–544. 11305745.
24. Wan Omar A, Sulaiman O, Yusof S, Ismail G, Fatmah MS, Rahmah N, Khairul AA. Epidemiological screening of lymphatic filariasis among immigrants using dipstick colloidal dye immunoassay. Malays J Med Sci 2001;8:19–24. 22893756.
25. Smits HL, Basahi MA, Diaz R, Marrodan T, Douglas JT, Rocha A, Veerman J, Zheludkov MM, Witte OW, de Jong J, Gussenhoven GC, Goris MG, van Der Hoorn MA. Development and Evaluation of a Rapid Dipstick Assay for Serodiagnosis of Acute Human Brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:4179–4182. 10565959.
26. Schallig HDFH, Cardoso L, Hommers M, Kroon N, Belling G, Rodrigues M, Semiaõ-Santos SJ, Vetter H. Development of a dipstick assay for detection of leishmania-specific canine antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:193–197. 14715752.
27. Zhu Y, He W, Liang Y, Xu M, Yu C, Hua W, Chao G. Development of a rapid, simple dipstick dye immunoassay for schistosomiasis diagnosis. J Immunol Methods 2002;266:1–5. 12133617.
28. Wang SJ, Chang WF, Wang MY, Hsiung KP, Liu YC. Development of a disperse dye immunochromatographic test for the detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2008;125:284–290. 18602701.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

The comparison of DDIA and ELISA for the detection of antibodies against N. caninum in cattle

ELISA results DDIA results
No. of positive (%) No. of negative (%) Total (%)
No. of positive (%) 39 (26.0) 8 (33.5) 47 (33.3)
No. of negative (%) 12 (8.0) 91 (66.6) 103 (66.6)
Total (%) 51 (34.0) 99 (66.0) 150 (100)