Ocular Sparganosis: The First Report of Spirometra ranarum in Thailand

Article information

Korean J Parasito. 2020;58(5):577-581

Publication date (electronic) : 2020 October 22

doi : https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2020.58.5.577

Wilai Saksirisampant^1,†, Chatanun Eamudomkarn^2,3,†, Hyeong-Kyu Jeon², Keeseon S. Eom², Buravej Assavapongpaiboon⁴, Sunisa Sintuwong⁵, Wasee Tulvatana^4,

¹Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

²Department of Parasitology, Parasite Research Center and Parasite Resource Bank, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine, Cheongju 28644, Korea

³Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

⁴Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

⁵Mettapracharak Eye Centre, Mettapracharak (Wat Raikhing) Hospital, Nakhon Pathom 73210, Thailand

^*Corresponding author (waseetulvatana@gmail.com)

^†

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 2020 April 3; Revised 2020 August 19; Accepted 2020 August 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sparganosis is a zoonotic disease caused by infection with the plerocercoid larvae or sparganum stages of Spirometra species (diphyllobothridean=pseudophyllidean) tapeworm. Adult worms reside in the intestines of the definitive host (dogs and cats). Human infection occurs accidentally by ingesting contaminated water with copepods or undercooked meat of amphibian, fish, and bird or using infected meat of snakes as a poultice [1]. After passing through the intestinal wall, spargana then migrate through the body tissues. The larva can invade the subcutaneous tissue, the central nervous system, breast, and eyes [1]. The common site of the infection is subcutaneous tissue which is about half of the reported cases in Thailand [1,2]. The ocular site is rare which is present in the eyelid and subconjunctival swelling with pain, itching, and epiphora. These should be differentiated from allergic blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and other common tissue nematodes of gnathostomiasis [3,4]. The larva morphology is species undistinguished. By molecular characterization, various species were recognized by many investigators worldwide. S. mansoni is responsible for this disease in Asia, whereas S. mansonoides is important in North America [5,6]. S. erinaceieuropaei, S. decipiens, S. ranarum, and S. theileri were more recently reported as valid from the United States, Myanmar, Korea, China, Japan, and Tanzania [7–10]. In Thailand, S. erinaceieuropaei was the only species reported [11]. In this study, we reported an ocular sparganosis from a Thai patient that was identified, based on the morphological and histological examinations on the plerocercoid larva. The Spirometra species was identified by molecular analysis of cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1).

CASE DESCRIPTION

The ethics review was exempted by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (COE No. 003/2020, IRB No. 844/62).

Surgery

On the movable mass, surgical removal was done. A white plerocercoid larva was revealed (Fig. 1A) and sent to the ophthalmology and parasitology departments of the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok. The pathological section (Fig. 1B) of the parasite tissue showed a single layer of thick tegument (arrow), loose parenchyma cells, laminated basophilic calcareous corpuscles (calcium carbonate), and a presence of longitudinal muscle bundles without body cavity. Ocular sparganosis was diagnosed. Prednisolone with a tapering dose was given. The proptosis and swelling resolved and have not recurred.

Fig. 1

(A) Whitish plerocercoid larva was revealed from the upper eyelid during surgical removal of the mass. (B) Histological finding (hematoxylin and eosin stain).

Molecular identification of the specimen

To extract DNA for molecular identification of the Spirometra species, 10 μm-thicknesses of unstained thin sections (cut from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimen) were used. The sections were deparaffinized by dissolved in xylene, followed by absolute ethanol. Genomic DNA was extracted from QIAamp^® DNA FFPE Tissue Kits (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was eluted in 30 μl of sterilized distilled water and used as a template for whole genome amplification. DNA was amplified by GenomePlex^® Complete Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) Kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene was targeted in PCR amplification. The partial fragments of the cox1 gene were amplified by PCR. PCR reactions were performed in a 20 μl reaction volume consisting of 4 μl of HiPi Plus 5× PCR master mix (Elpis Biotech. Inc., Daejeon, Korea), 10 pmol of each primer, 2 μl of extracted DNA, and nuclease-free water added up to a final volume. Reactions were performed in a thermocycler (Biometra Co., Goettingen, Germany). Thermocycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 46°C for 40 sec, and then extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Each set of experiments included negative and positive controls. Nuclease-free water replaced DNA templates for negative controls.

The PCR primers were designed based on cox1 sequences of S. erinaceieuropaei and S. decipiens. The primer was used to amplify the cox1 region as follows; pcox4f: 5′-CAT GGT TGC TTT TTC CTT-3′ and pcox4r: 5′-ACT ACG AGA CAC AAA AYT ATC 3′, pcox6f: 5′-CTA TTC CTG TGT TGG CTG CT-3′ and pcox6r: 5′-TAT CAT AWG AAC AAC CTA ATT TAC-3′, pcox9f: 5′-GGK ATA AAG GTG TTT TCT TG-3′ and pcox9r: 5′-ATM ACA TAA TGA AAA TGA GCC ACC-3′, pcox10f: 5′-GGK GGT GTT ACY GGT ATA AT-3′ and pcox10r: 5′-GAY ACT ATA CAA TGA CAC TGT-3′.

PCR products were confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using DokDo-Prep PCR Purification Kit (Elpis Biotech) for direct DNA sequencing. Sequence analysis was performed using Geneious Program (Biomatters Co., Auckland, New Zealand).

For the molecular analysis of the plerocercoid, 4 of cox1 fragments were amplified successfully. The fragments were corresponded to position 360–483 (123 bp), 643–800 (157 bp), 986–1,097 (111 bp) and 1,102–1,254 (152 bp) of cox1 gene. Homology search of the PCR-amplified products was conducted against regions of the mitochondrion, the complete genome of S. erinaceieuropaei (GenBank No. KJ599680.1), S. theileri (GenBank No. MK955901.1), S. ranarum (GenBank No. MN264212.1) and S. decipiens (GenBank No. KJ599679.1) have been presented. Our results were summarized and shown in Table 1. All of 4 fragments sequences showed high similarities of S. ranarum. The total length of the sequence was 543 bp showed 99% sequence homology to S. ranarum. The sequences of S. ranarum were submitted to the GenBank database under numbers GenBank No. MT590763.1. Therefore, the plerocercoid from the ocular sparganosis patient was identified as S. ranarum.

Table 1

Sequence homology of the PCR-amplified cox1 fragments

DISCUSSION

This study is the first report of S. ranarum from a sparganosis patient in Thailand. We showed that proper technique of extraction and amplification of short fragments DNA from FFPE tissue allowed us to speculate successfully of the parasite. The molecular technique is a powerful tool for species identification. S. ranarum was reported first time by Gastaldi (1854) in Italy as Diphyllobothrium ranarum found in the frog (Rana tigrina) [8,12]. By molecular analysis based on mitochondrial genome analysis, the 2 most common species of S. erinaceieuropaei and S. decipiens have been reported in Asian [11,13–15]. Recently, S. ranarum was reported from frogs in Myanmar by using mitochondrial cox1 and nad1 genes [8]. The species identification from the study was based on morphology and molecular analysis. The authors found that sequence differences in cox1 and nad1 genes were 2.1% between S. ranarum and S. decipiens and were 9.5% (cox1) and 11.9% (nad1) between S. ranarum and S. erinaceieuroapei [8]. The patient was from the Northeast region of the country where maybe possible intercontinental or intracontinental traveling or the autochthonous infection as well.

The first case report of sparganosis in Thailand was in 1943, and until 2002, there were 34 reported cases in which half (50.0%) of these were on the ocular site [16]. Another literature review showed 1/3 of sparganosis patients had ocular infection [2]. Molecular studies of Spirometra in Thailand have a limit. The parasites from a recent report in 9 cases from a tertiary hospital, S. erinaceieuropaei were identified as based on cox1 gene [11].

The ocular site of the disease reported is challenging. The diagnosis can initially be missed as gnathostomiasis, which is highly prevalent and have a similar clinical presentation [4]. Gnathostomiasis is unlikely in this case because there was no improvement after the 3-week treatment of albendazole. Moreover, there was no clue of the absolute eosinophil count. Due to the common antigenic epitope among helminth could have ELISA been strongly positive and a more specific technique of Western blot showed a weak reaction in this case [17]. Nevertheless, past infection of gnathostomiasis might not be excluded.

Ocular sparganosis usually presents with eyelid and subconjunctival swelling which should be differentiated from allergic blepharitis and conjunctivitis. The common signs and symptoms include complaints of lacrimation, itching, pain, eye redness, and swelling of the eyelid. Other less common ocular presentation includes intraorbital mass in the soft tissue, endophthalmitis, and blindness [18,19]. Generally, patients have only one lesion, caused by a single sparganum larva. However, there was a case report with more than one lesion with the presence of spargana in each lesion [20].

It is also difficult to differentiate ocular sparganosis from myositic idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease (IOI) as well. As a radiologic finding, even with the recently proposed diagnostic criteria of myositic IOI, misdiagnosis occurs due to partial improvement of symptoms after corticosteroid therapy [3,19]. Most ocular sparganosis cases are diagnosed by the discovery of sparganum from infected tissue, mainly from the conjunctiva and eyelid, as seen with this case. Complete surgical removal is needed; otherwise, sparganosis can recur by regeneration of the larva that was left behind.

In this case, with a history of eating raw fish, the patient was probably infected with plerocercoid larvae of Spirometra spp. in fish. However, due to the prevalence of infection, gnathostomiasis, which can produce a similar clinical picture, was initially suspected [4]. Multiple courses of albendazole, as well as prednisolone, were given with intermittent improvement of symptoms. The steroid treatment allowed the orbital inflammation to partially subside, but the treatment did not kill the worm. In the later course, the patient developed symptoms of proptosis and ophthalmoplegia and, with the evidence on CT scan, IOI was diagnosed. Multiple repeated doses of prednisolone were given with partial improvement. Finally, the diagnosis was reached by the eyelid mass removing.

In conclusion, this is the first report of S. ranarum ocular sparganosis in Thailand. The ocular cases mostly presented with superficial ocular mass lesions. Before the diagnosis of orbital inflammation, this infection should be considered. The main treatment is the surgical removal of the parasite. Gross morphology with deep invagination and histology finding of the plerocercoid larva are key features for diagnosis. Molecular speciation was a promising technique for the parasite species. Public health surveillance programs are recommended for a person to avoid consuming untreated natural water and insufficiently cooked meat.

Article information Continued