Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSPTM
  • E-Submission

PHD : Parasites, Hosts and Diseases

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

1
results for

"microfluidic"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"microfluidic"

Brief Communication
Clinical Usefulness of LabChip Real-time PCR using Lab-On-a-Chip Technology for Diagnosing Malaria
Jeeyong Kim, Da Hye Lim, Do-CiC Mihn, Jeonghun Nam, Woong Sik Jang, Chae Seung Lim
Korean J Parasitol 2021;59(1):77-82.
Published online February 19, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2021.59.1.77
As malaria remains a major health problem worldwide, various diagnostic tests have been developed, including microscopy-based and rapid diagnostic tests. LabChip real-time PCR (LRP) is a small and portable device used to diagnose malaria using lab-on-a-chip technology. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LRP for detecting malaria parasites. Two hundred thirteen patients and 150 healthy individuals were enrolled from May 2009 to October 2015. A diagnostic detectability of LRP for malaria parasites was compared to that of conventional RT-PCR. Sensitivity of LRP for Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 95.5%, 96.0%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity of LRP for P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale was 100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Cohen’s Kappa coefficients between LRP and CFX96 for detecting P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. malariae, and P. ovale were 0.96, 0.98, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. Significant difference was not observed between the results of LRP and conventional RT-PCR and microscopic examination. A time required to amplify DNAs using LRP and conventional RT-PCR was 27 min and 86 min, respectively. LRP amplified DNAs 2 times more fast than conventional RT-PCR due to the faster heat transfer. Therefore, LRP could be employed as a useful tool for detecting malaria parasites in clinical laboratories.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Current Trends in Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery Systems for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria: A Review
    Rohitas Deshmukh, Bhuvaneshwari Dewangan, Ranjit K. Harwansh, Rutvi Agrawal, Akash Garg, Himansu Chopra
    Current Drug Delivery.2025; 22(3): 310.     CrossRef
  • Parasitic protozoa: Biosystematics, identification, pathogenicity, causes and remedial measures
    Gourav Mishra, Razia Kausar, Tushar Yadav
    Microbial Pathogenesis.2025; 207: 107867.     CrossRef
  • Internet-enabled lab-on-a-chip technology for education
    Tyler Sano, Mohammad Julker Neyen Sampad, Jesus Gonzalez-Ferrer, Sebastian Hernandez, Samira Vera-Choqqueccota, Paola A. Vargas, Roberto Urcuyo, Natalia Montellano Duran, Mircea Teodorescu, David Haussler, Holger Schmidt, Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advances in Malaria Diagnostic Methods in Resource-Limited Settings: A Systematic Review
    Akua K. Yalley, Joyous Ocran, Jacob E. Cobbinah, Evangeline Obodai, Isaac K. Yankson, Anna A. Kafintu-Kwashie, Gloria Amegatcher, Isaac Anim-Baidoo, Nicholas I. Nii-Trebi, Diana A. Prah
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease.2024; 9(9): 190.     CrossRef
  • Review of the Current Landscape of the Potential of Nanotechnology for Future Malaria Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccination Strategies
    Arnau Guasch-Girbau, Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets
    Pharmaceutics.2021; 13(12): 2189.     CrossRef
  • 5,135 View
  • 132 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • Crossref