Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81
Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83
Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84 Detection of Toxoplasma antigens and antibodies in mice infected with different strains of Toxoplasma gondii
Detection of Toxoplasma antigens and antibodies in mice infected with different strains of Toxoplasma gondii
Y H Lee,*K Y Kim,M S Kang and D W Shin
Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Taejon 301-131, Korea.
Received August 21, 1995; Accepted August 31, 1995.
Abstract
This study aims to assess the possible strain-dependent variations in detection of Toxoplasma antigens and antibodies. The virulent RH strain or avirulent Beverley strain of T. gondii were injected into mice, intraperitoneally, and their antigens, antibodies and parasites were identified from the blood or tissues; liver, brain and spleen by ELISA, Western blot and PCR. In mice infected with RH strain, circulating antigens and parasitemia were first detected from 2 days after infection, and Toxoplasma DNA were found in the blood, liver, brain and spleen from 3 days after infection. It was impossible to detect specific IgM and IgG antibodies to T. gondii, and any specific band was not found by Western blot. In mice infected with Beverley strain, circulating antigens were detected between day 10 and day 35. The Toxoplasma DNA was found in the blood and liver from day 15 until day 60, and in the brain from day 20. But Toxoplasma DNA in the spleen were mainly detected between day 10 and day 30. The IgM antibodies were first appeared on day 10 post-infection, and were noted obviously increased between day 15 and 25. The IgG antibodies were first detected on day 15, and showed progressively increased titers. The antibody binding bands were specific according to infection period. Sera from mice infected with Beverley strain reacted mainly with the antigen of 27.5-kDa and 32.5-kDa. In conclusion, mice infected with RH strain revealed Toxoplasma antigens strongly, but not antibodies. However, mice infected with Beverley strain revealed both the Toxoplasma antigens and antibodies. The present results showed that immune responses are different between avirulent and virulent T. gondii.
Figures
Fig. 1 Detection of circulating antigens(•), specific IgM antibodies(▪) and IgG antibodies(▴) in the sera of mice infected with RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. of 5 mice, except day 6 post-infection.
Fig. 2 Detection of circulating antigens(•), specific IgM antibodies(▪) and IgG antibodies(▴) in the sera of mice infected with Beverley strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. of 5 mice, except day 6 post-infection.
Fig. 3 Time course of the IgG immunoblot patterns of sera samples from mice infected with the RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii. Lane 1, molecular weight standard (kDa); 2, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 3-14 (days after infection): 3 and 4, 1; 5-7, 2; 8-10, 3; 11 and 12, 4; 13, 5; 14, 6.
Fig. 4 Time course of the IgG immunoblot patterns of sera samples from mice infected with the Beverley strain of Toxoplasma gondii. Lane 1, molecular weight standard (kDa); 2, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 3-42 (days after infection): 3 and 4, 5; 5-7, 10; 8-12, 15; 13-16, 20; 17-21, 25; 22-26, 30; 27-31, 35; 32-35, 40; 36-39, 50; 40-42, 60.
Fig. 5 Detection of T. gondii DNA from blood (panel A) and liver (panel B) in mice infected with the RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Lane 1, λ-Hind III marker; 2, negative control; 3, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 4-10 (days after infection): 4, 1; 5, 2; 6, 3; 7, 4; 8, 5; 9 and 10, 6. Lane 11, 123-bp marker ladder.
Fig. 6 Detection of T. gondii DNA from brain (panel A) and spleen (panel B) in mice infected with the RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Lane 1, λ-Hind III marker; 2, negative control; 3, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 4-10 (days after infection): 4, 1; 5, 2; 6, 3; 7, 4; 8, 5; 9 and 10, 6. Lane 11, 123-bp marker ladder.
Fig. 7 Detection of T. gondii DNA from blood (panel A) and liver (panel B) in mice infected with the Beverley strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Lane 1, λ-Hind III marker; 2, negative control; 3, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 4-13 (days after infection): 4, 5; 5, 10; 6, 15; 7, 20; 8, 25; 9, 30; 10, 35; 11, 40; 12, 50; 13,60. Lane 14, 123-bp marker ladder.
Fig. 8 Detection of T. gondii DNA from brain (panel A) and spleen (panel B) in mice infected with the Beverley strain of Toxoplasma gondii during course of infection. Lane 1, λ-Hind III marker; 2, negative control; 3, serum of normal mouse. Lanes 4-13 (days after infection): 4, 5; 5, 10; 6, 15; 7, 20; 8, 25; 9, 30; 10, 35; 11, 40; 12, 50; 13,60. Lane 14, 123-bp marker ladder.
Tables
Table 1 Detection of circulation antigens and specific antibodies in the sera of mice infected with RH strain of Toxoplasma gondii
Table 2 Detection of circulation antigens and specific antibodies in the sera of mice infected with Beverley strain of Toxoplasma gondii
References
1.
Acebes MV, Diez B, Garcia-Rodriguez JA, Viens P, Cisterna R. Detection of circulating antigens in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1994;51(4):506–511.
2.
Izraeli S, Pfleiderer C, Lion T. Detection of gene expression by PCR amplification of RNA derived from frozen heparinized whole blood. Nucleic Acids Res 1991;19(21):6051.
3.
Burg JL, Perelman D, Kasper LH, Ware PL, Boothroyd JC. Molecular analysis of the gene encoding the major surface antigen of Toxoplasma gondii. J Immunol 1988;141(10):3584–3591.
4.
Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd JC. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27(8):1787–1792.
5.
Canolfi E, et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol 1987;6:44–48.
6.
Cazabonne P, Bessieres MH, Seguela JP. Kinetics study and characterisation of target excreted/secreted antigens of immunoglobulin G, M, A and E antibodies from mice infected with different strains of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol Res 1994;80(1):58–63.
7.
Chardes T, Bourguin I, Mevelec MN, Dubremetz JF, Bout D. Antibody responses to Toxoplasma gondii in sera, intestinal secretions, and milk from orally infected mice and characterization of target antigens. Infect Immun 1990;58(5):1240–1246.
8.
Choi WY. Diagnosis and epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 1990;28 Suppl:41–44.
9.
Derouin F, Mazeron MC, Garin YJ. Comparative study of tissue culture and mouse inoculation methods for demonstration of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25(9):1597–1600.
10.
Grover CM, Thulliez P, Remington JS, Boothroyd JC. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of congenital Toxoplasma infection by using polymerase chain reaction and amniotic fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28(10):2297–2301.
11.
Grimwood J, Smith JE. Kinetics of the growth and variation in infectivity of Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1991;85(6):659–661.
12.
Handman E, Remington JS. Antibody responses to toxoplasma antigens in mice infected with strains of different virulence. Infect Immun 1980;29(1):215–220.
13.
Hitt JA, Filice GA. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii parasitemia by gene amplification, cell culture, and mouse inoculation. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30(12):3181–3184.
14.
Huskinson J, Stepick-Biek PN, Araujo FG, Thulliez P, Suzuki Y, Remington JS. Toxoplasma antigens recognized by immunoglobulin G subclasses during acute and chronic infection. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27(9):2031–2038.
15.
Ise Y, Iida T, Sato K, Suzuki T, Shimada K, Nishioka K. Detection of circulating antigens in sera of rabbits infected with Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun 1985;48(1):269–272.
17.
Kasper LH, Ware PL. Recognition and characterization of stage-specific oocyst/sporozoite antigens of Toxoplasma gondii by human antisera. J Clin Invest 1985;75(5):1570–1577.
18.
Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227(5259):680–685.
Makioka A, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi A. Recognition of tachyzoite and bradyzoite antigens of Toxoplasma gondii by infected hosts. Infect Immun 1991;59(8):2763–2766.
21.
McCabe R, Remington JS. Toxoplasmosis: the time has come. N Engl J Med 1988;318(5):313–315.
22.
Savva D, Morris JC, Johnson JD, Holliman RE. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Med Microbiol 1990;32(1):25–31.
23.
Sumyuen MH, Garin YJ, Derouin F. Early kinetics of Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice infected orally with cysts of an avirulent strain. J Parasitol 1995;81(2):327–329.
24.
Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979;76(9):4350–4354.
25.
Turunen HJ. Detection of soluble antigens of Toxoplasma gondii by a four-layer modification of an enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1983;17(5):768–773.
26.
van Knapen F, Panggabean SO. Detection of circulating antigen during acute infections with Toxoplasma gondii by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1977;6(6):545–547.
27.
Voller A, Bidwell DE, Bartlett A, Fleck DG, Perkins M, Oladehin B. A microplate enzyme-immunoassay for toxoplasma antibody. J Clin Pathol 1976;29(2):150–153.
28.
Ware PL, Kasper LH. Strain-specific antigens of Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun 1987;55(3):778–783.
29.
Wastling JM, Nicoll S, Buxton D. Comparison of two gene amplification methods for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in experimentally infected sheep. J Med Microbiol 1993;38(5):360–365.
30.
Weiss LM, Udem SA, Salgo M, Tanowitz HB, Wittner M. Sensitive and specific detection of toxoplasma DNA in an experimental murine model: use of Toxoplasma gondii-specific cDNA and the polymerase chain reaction. J Infect Dis 1991;163(1):180–186.