Prevalence and Multilocus Genotyping of <i>Giardia lamblia</i> in Cattle in Jiangxi Province, China: Novel Assemblage E Subtypes Identified

Sen Li; Yang Zou; Xue-Liang Zhang; Ping Wang; Xiao-Qing Chen; Xing-Quan Zhu

doi:10.3347/kjp.2020.58.6.681

Korean J Parasito > Volume 58(6):2020 > Article

Li, Zou, Zhang, Wang, Chen, and Zhu: Prevalence and Multilocus Genotyping of Giardia lamblia in Cattle in Jiangxi Province, China: Novel Assemblage E Subtypes Identified

Brief Communication

The Korean Journal of Parasitology 2020; 58(6): 681-687.

Published online: December 31, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2020.58.6.681

Prevalence and Multilocus Genotyping of Giardia lamblia in Cattle in Jiangxi Province, China: Novel Assemblage E Subtypes Identified

Sen Li^1,², Yang Zou², Xue-Liang Zhang³, Ping Wang^1,^*, Xiao-Qing Chen^1,^*, Xing-Quan Zhu^2,^4,^*

¹Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Animal Health, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330045, China

²State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730046, China

³Nanchang Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330009, China

⁴College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

^*Corresponding authors (xingquanzhu1@hotmail.com; chenxiaoqing2013jl@163.com; 38901499@qq.com)

Received August 17, 2020 Revised October 18, 2020 Accepted November 8, 2020

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Giardia lamblia is a common enteric pathogen associated with diarrheal diseases. There are some reports of G. lamblia infection among different breeds of cattle in recent years worldwide. However, it is yet to know whether cattle in Jiangxi province, southeastern China is infected with G. lamblia. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and examine the multilocus genotypes of G. lamblia in cattle in Jiangxi province. A total of 556 fecal samples were collected from 3 cattle breeds (dairy cattle, beef cattle, and buffalo) in Jiangxi province, and the prevalence and genotypes of G. lamblia were determined by the nested PCR amplification of the beta-giardin (bg) gene. A total of 52 samples (9.2%) were positive for G. lamblia. The highest prevalence of G. lamblia was detected in dairy cattle (20.0%), followed by that in beef cattle (6.4%), and meat buffalo (0.9%). Multilocus sequence typing of G. lamblia was performed based on sequences of the bg, triose phosphate isomerase and glutamate dehydrogenase loci, and 22, 42, and 52 samples were amplifiable, respectively, forming 15 MLGs. Moreover, one mixed G. lamblia infection (assemblages A and E) was found in the present study. Altogether, 6 novel assemblage E subtypes (E41*–E46*) were identified for the first time. These results not only provided baseline data for the control of G. lamblia infection in cattle in this southeastern province of China, but also enriched the molecular epidemiological data and genetic diversity of G. lamblia in cattle.

Key words: Giardia lamblia, cattle, prevalence, multilocus genotyping, Jiangxi Province

Giardia lamblia is a common zoonotic parasite, causing intestinal diseases such as diarrhea in humans and animals. In the life cycle of this parasite, cysts are spread directly through feces by infected humans or animals [1]. The transmission route is via fecal-oral or by ingesting food and water contaminated with cysts [1]. G. lamblia can cause giardiasis, which may lead to asymptomatic infection or abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and vomiting seriously impacting on health condition, resulting in low productivity in ruminants [2]. Cattle is one of the main hosts of G. lamblia that can excrete cysts, which is the potential threat to humans [3].

Molecular techniques have been applied for G. lamblia detection [4]. To date, 8 assemblages (A to H) of G. lamblia have been identified from different hosts. Among these assemblages, assemblages A and B are considered to be zoonotic, while other assemblages are mostly host specific [1]. In addition, assemblage E is the dominant genotype of G. lamblia occurring in cattle [5–8], and zoonotic assemblages A and B have also been identified in cattle and humans in some studies [9–13]. However, there are some studies that have found assemblage E existing in human cases [5,14,15].

Despite the widespread presence of G. lamblia in cattle, the clinical significance of this organism in cattle is not fully understood. G. lamblia infection is associated with the occurrence of diarrhea in the cattle [8,16]. Recently, a study showed that diarrhea cattle is more likely to be infected with pathogens than non-diarrhea animals [17]. Furthermore, healthy cattle are also infected with G. lamblia [7,8]. Therefore, the prevention is more important than treatment. Multilocus sequence typing has been used to identify multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of G. lamblia in dairy cattle based on sequences of the beta-giardin (bg), glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) and triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) [18]. But most of previous studies have identified G. lamblia in cattle by a single gene locus only [19].

Jiangxi province is located on the south bank of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, with a population of more than 40 million people. It is one of the main beef producing provinces in southern China, with a large number of cattle being sold to southeast coastal cities. To date, there was no report of G. lamblia infection in cattle in Jiangxi province. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to investigate the prevalence and examine the MLGs of G. lamblia in cattle in Jiangxi Province, southeastern China.

A total of 556 fecal samples were randomly collected from cattle in 8 farms of Jiangxi province, southeastern China, including Nanchang city (2 dairy cattle farms and 1 beef cattle farm), Gao’an city (2 beef cattle farms), Xinyu city (1 meat buffalo farm) and Ji’an city (1 beef cattle farm and 1 free-range farm for beef cattle). This study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. All cattle were handled in strict accordance with good animal practice according to the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China. All samples were obtained immediately after defecation by PE gloves and were stored in separate 50 ml centrifuge tubes containing 2.5% potassium dichromate, then packed into the box with ice and sent to the laboratory. Feces were stored at 4°C until extraction of genomic DNA. The information of each fecal sample was recorded, including geographical location, age, breed and collection date.

The stool samples were washed with double distilled water to wash off potassium dichromate, then 200 mg of each stool sample was packed into a 2 ml centrifuge tube for genomic DNA extraction using a commercial E.Z.N.A^® Stool DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, Georgia, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The obtained genomic DNA samples were stored in −20°C until PCR amplification.

Giardia lamblia in fecal samples were identified by PCR-based sequencing of the bg locus [20]. All the bg-positive samples were then amplified to further identify MLGs of G. lamblia in cattle using primers for the gdh and tpi gene loci [20,21] (Supplementary Table S1). The primary PCR reaction mixture contained genomic DNA (2 μl), 10× Ex Taq Buffer (Mg²⁺–free) (2.5 μl), MgCl₂ (2 mM), dNTP Mixture (0.2 mM), TaKaRa Ex Taq (0.625 U) (TaKaRa Shuzo Co., Ltd) and each primer (0.4 μM) in a total volume of 25 μl. The 2 μl of primary PCR product as template was amplified by the secondary PCR with the same reaction conditions. The positive (G. lamblia DNA) and negative (deionized water) control were added in each PCR amplification. The secondary PCR products were subsequently detected by electrophoresis in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels with ethidium bromide.

All positive second-PCR products were sent to Xi’an Qingke Biotechnology Company for 2-directional sequencing. The Chromas v.2.6. was used to check the sequencing chromatograms. The obtained sequences were aligned with relevant sequences available in GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.lm.nih.gov/GenBank) and were analyzed by the Clustal X 1.81 [22] to identify the genotypes of G. lamblia. The nucleotide sequences of novel subtypes in assemblages were deposited to the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database under accession numbers: MT123524 for the bg locus, MT123525–MT123526 for the gdh locus, and MT123527–MT123529 for the tpi locus. The phylogenetic relationships among G. lamblia isolates were re-constructed based on gdh and tpi sequences using a Neighbor-Joining algorithm [23] in DNAStar 5.0 [24], and the Kimura 2-parameter analysis (1,000 replicates) was selected.

The difference in G. lamblia prevalence among different breeds, regions and ages of cattle was assessed using the Chi-square (χ²) analysis by IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Armonk Corp., Armonk, New York, USA), and P-value of 0.05 was considered as the threshold for significant difference.

In this study, G. lamblia was detected in 9.2% (95% CI 6.81–11.57) of 556 cattle fecal samples from 4 cities of Jiangxi province, with the prevalence ranging from 0.9% to 16.2% (Table 1). The highest G. lamblia prevalence (16.2%, 95% CI 11.37–21.06) was detected in cattle in Nanchang city, which was significantly higher than that in Xinyu city (0.9%, 95% CI 0–2.73) (P<0.01). The different prevalence could be due to different feeding methods. Moreover, dairy cattle (20%) and beef cattle (6.4%) were more susceptible to G. lamblia than buffalos (0.9%), for which the ORs were 26.75 (95% CI 3.60–198.79) and 7.27 (95% CI 0.96–55.13), respectively (Table 1). This result may be related to different management and sanitation status of different farms, which suggests that we should pay more attention to control G. lamblia transmission in dairy cattle and beef cattle in investigated areas. Furthermore, the highest G. lamblia prevalence was detected in cattle aged 1–3 months (19.6%, 95% CI 8.10–31.03), which is consistent with that of previous studies [25–27]. Cattle aged 1–3 months (19.6%) had a significantly higher G. lamblia prevalence compared with cattle aged more than 24 months (7.5%) (P<0.05) (Table 1). This finding illustrates that calves are more susceptible to G. lamblia infection.

The overall G. lamblia prevalence (9.2%) in cattle in this study was higher than that in cattle in Zhaoqing city, Guangdong Province (2.2%) [28], and Qinghai Province, China (5.2%) [29], an arid area of central Iran (4.2%) [30], Thailand (6.0%) [31], and Urmia, northwest Iran (9.34%) [32]; but lower than that in Guangdong Province (74.2%) [6], Hubei Province (22.6%) [33] and Sichuan Province, China (9.4%) [34]; Egypt (13.3%) [35], South Korea (10.0%) [36], Ethiopia (9.6%) [37] and Vietnam (13.8%) [38]. The difference in G. lamblia prevalence may be related to difference in study design, breed and age of cattle studied and sampling size.

In the present study, 52 positive samples represented 2 assemblages (assemblage E and assemblage A) (Tables 2, 3), containing one novel subtype of assemblage E (named as E41*, n=5) based on sequence analyses of the bg locus (Table 2). Moreover, 42 of the 52 bg-positive samples were tested positive at the gdh locus, and 22 samples were tested tpi-positive. Two novel subtypes (named as E45*, n=4 and E46*, n=1) and 3 novel subtypes (named as E42*, n=5; E43*, n=2 and E44*, n=1) of assemblage E were identified at the gdh and tpi loci, respectively (Table 2). Previous studies have shown that the assemblage E is the primary genotype in different animals [1,39–45]. Both assemblage A and assemblage E were also found in humans [1,5]. These findings suggested that cattle could be reservoir host of G. lamblia and transport this zoonotic pathogen to humans and other animals. MLG analysis can assess the genetic diversity of G. lamblia [46]. Among these 52 samples, 16 samples were successfully amplified and sequenced at all the 3 genetic loci (bg, gdh, and tpi) (Table 4), forming 15 novel MLGs (named as MLGE1-E14, MLGA1) and one mixed infection (Table 4), which revealed a high genetic diversity of G. lamblia assemblages.

The phylogenetic tree based on G. lamblia tpi-sequences and gdh-sequences were constructed in order to evaluate the genetic relationships of the G. lamblia isolates. The results showed that G. lamblia isolates from cattle (novel subtypes E41*–46*) were clustered within the assemblage E (Figs. 1, 2), which contained G. lamblia isolates from animals and humans with a higher confidence value, revealing closer genetic relationship (Fig. 1).

In conclusion, this study revealed a 9.2% G. lamblia prevalence in cattle in Jiangxi province, southeastern China, and identified 6 novel assemblage E subtypes (designated as E41*–46*) for the first time. Fourteen novel MLGs within assemblage E and one novel MLG within assemblage A were identified. These findings revealed the prevalence and MLGs of G. lamblia in cattle in Jiangxi province, which not only enriched the genetic diversity of G. lamblia, but also provided baseline data for controlling G. lamblia infection in animals and humans in this southeastern province of China.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table S1.

Nested PCR primers, annealing temperature, and expected fragment size for the detection of Giardia lamblia in cattle

kjp-58-6-681-suppl.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Project support was provided by the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) (Grant No. CAAS-ASTIP-2016-LVRI-03) and the Elite Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Conflict of interest

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Feng YY, Xiao LH. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and Giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2011;24:110-140 https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00033-10

2. Bartelt LA, Sartor RB. Advances in understanding Giardia: determinants and mechanisms of chronic sequelae. F1000Prime Rep 2015;7:62 https://doi.org/10.12703/P7-62

3. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol 2013;43:110-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.001

4. Thompson RCA, Ash A. Molecular epidemiology of Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections. Infect Genet Evol 2016;40:315-323 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.09.028

5. Abdel-Moein KA, Saeed H. The zoonotic potential of Giardia intestinalis assemblage E in rural settings. Parasitol Res 2016;115:3197-3202 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5081-7

6. Hogan JN, Miller WA, Cranfield MR, Ramer J, Hassell J, Noheri JB, Conrad PA, Gilardi KV. Giardia in mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer), and domestic cattle in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. J Wildl Dis 2014;50:21-30 https://doi.org/10.7589/2012-09-229

7. Feng Y, Gong X, Zhu K, Li N, Yu Z, Guo Y, Weng Y, Kváč M, Feng Y, Xiao L. Prevalence and genotypic identification of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong, China. Parasit Vectors 2019;12:41 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3310-5

8. Wang R, Li N, Jiang W, Guo Y, Wang X, Jin Y, Feng Y, Xiao L. Infection patterns, clinical significance, and genetic characteristics of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Jiangsu, China. Parasitol Res 2019;118:3053-3060 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06426-3

9. Bartley PM, Roehe BK, Thomson S, Shaw HJ, Peto F, Innes EA, Katzer F. Detection of potentially human infectious assemblages of Giardia duodenalis in fecal samples from beef and dairy cattle in Scotland. Parasitology 2019;146:1123-1130 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018001117

10. Lee YJ, Han DG, Ryu JH, Chae JB, Chae JS, Yu DH, Park J, Park BK, Kim HC, Choi KS. Identification of zoonotic Giardia duodenalis in Korean native calves with normal feces. Parasitol Res 2018;117:1969-1973 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5863-1

11. Wang X, Cai M, Jiang W, Wang Y, Jin Y, Li N, Guo Y, Feng Y, Xiao L. High genetic diversity of Giardia duodenalis assemblage E in pre-weaned dairy calves in Shanghai, China, revealed by multilocus genotyping. Parasitol Res 2017;116:2101-2110 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5509-8

12. Yu F, Li D, Chang Y, Wu Y, Guo Z, Jia L, Xu J, Li J, Qi M, Wang R, Zhang L. Molecular characterization of three intestinal protozoans in hospitalized children with different disease backgrounds in Zhengzhou, central China. Parasit Vectors 2019;12:543 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3800-5

13. Wang T, Fan YY, Koehler AV, Ma GX, Li T, Hu M, Gasser RB. First survey of Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon in diarrhoeic children from Wuhan, China. Infect Genet Evol 2017;51:127-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2017.03.006

14. Fantinatti M, Bello AR, Fernandes O, Da-Cruz AM. Identification of Giardia lamblia assemblage E in human points to a new anthropozoonotic cycle. J Infect Dis 2016;214:1256-1259 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw361

15. Zahedi A, Field D, Ryan U. Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis in humans in Queensland-first report of assemblage E. Parasitology 2017;144:1154-1161 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000439

16. Di Piazza F, Di Benedetto MA, Maida CM, Glorioso S, Adamo G, Mazzola T, Firenze A. A study on occupational exposure of Sicilian farmers to Giardia and Cryptosporidium. J Prev Med Hyg 2013;54:212-217.

17. Mahato MK, Singh DK, Rana HB, Acharya KP. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Giardia duodenalis infection in dairy cattle of Chitwan, Nepal. J Parasit Dis 2018;42:122-126 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-017-0975-6

18. Wang H, Zhao G, Chen G, Jian F, Zhang S, Feng C, Wang R, Zhu J, Dong H, Hua J, Wang M, Zhang L. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Henan, China. PLoS One 2014;9:e100453 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100453

19. Li J, Wang H, Wang R, Zhang L. Giardia duodenalis Infections in Humans and other animals in China. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2004 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02004

20. Lalle M, Pozio E, Capelli G, Bruschi F, Crotti D, Cacciò SM. Genetic heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of Giardia duodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int J Parasitol 2005;35:207-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.10.022

21. Azcona-Gutiérrez JM, de Lucio A, Hernández-de-Mingo M, García-García C, Soria-Blanco LM, Morales L, Aguilera M, Fuentes I, Carmena D. Molecular diversity and frequency of the diarrheagenic enteric protozoan Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in a hospital setting in northern Spain. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178575 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178575

22. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:4876-4882 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876

23. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406-425 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454

24. Burland TG. DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol 2000;132:71-91 https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71

25. Zhang XX, Tan QD, Zhao GH, Ma JG, Zheng WB, Ni XT, Zhao Q, Zhou DH, Zhu XQ. Prevalence, risk factors and multilocus genotyping of Giardia intestinalis in dairy cattle, Northwest China. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2016;63:498-504 https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12293

26. Mahato MK, Singh DK, Rana HB, Acharya KP. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Giardia duodenalis infection in dairy cattle of Chitwan. Nepal. J Parasit Dis 2018;42:122-126 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-017-0975-6

27. Maddox-Hyttel C, Langkjaer RB, Enemark HL, Vigre H. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in different age groups of Danish cattle and pigs—occurrence and management associated risk factors. Vet Parasitol 2006;141:48-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.032

28. Cui Z, Wang L, Cao L, Sun M, Liang N, Wang H, Chang Y, Lin X, Yu L, Wang R, Zhang S, Ning C, Zhang L. Genetic characteristics and geographic segregation of Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle from Guangdong Province, southern China. Infect Genet Evol 2018;66:95-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.09.019

29. Wang G, Wang G, Li X, Zhang X, Karanis G, Jian Y, Ma L, Karanis P. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in 1–2-month-old highland yaks in Qinghai Province, China. Parasitol Res 2018;117:1793-1800 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5861-3

30. Kiani-Salmi N, Fattahi-Bafghi A, Astani A, Sazmand A, Zahedi A, Firoozi Z, Ebrahimi B, Dehghani-Tafti A, Ryan U, Akrami-Mohajeri F. Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis in cattle, sheep and goats in an arid area of central Iran. Infect Genet Evol 2019;75:104021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.104021

31. Inpankaew T, Jiyipong T, Thadtapong N, Kengradomkij C, Pinyopanuwat N, Chimnoi W, Jittapalapong S. Prevalence and genotype of Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle from northern and northeastern part of Thailand. Acta Parasitol 2015;60:459-461 https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2015-0063

32. Malekifard F, Ahmadpour M. Molecular detection and identification of Giardia duodenalis in cattle of Urmia, northwest of Iran. Vet Res Forum 2018;9:81-85.

33. Fan Y, Wang T, Koehler AV, Hu M, Gasser RB. Molecular investigation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in pre- and post-weaned calves in Hubei Province, China. Parasit Vectors 2017;10:519 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2463-3

34. Zhong Z, Dan J, Yan G, Tu R, Tian Y, Cao S, Shen L, Deng J, Yu S, Geng Y, Gu X, Wang Y, Liu H, Peng G. Occurrence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium in pre-weaned dairy calves in central Sichuan province, China. Parasite 2018;25:45 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018046

35. Naguib D, El-Gohary AH, Mohamed AA, Roellig DM, Arafat N, Xiao L. Age patterns of Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis in dairy calves in Egypt. Parasitol Int 2018;67:736-741 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2018.07.012

36. Lee YJ, Han DG, Ryu JH, Chae JB, Chae JS, Yu DH, Park J, Park BK, Kim HC, Choi KS. Identification of zoonotic Giardia duodenalis in Korean native calves with normal feces. Parasitol Res 2018;117:1969-1973 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5863-1

37. Wegayehu T, Karim MR, Erko B, Zhang L, Tilahun G. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis isolates from calves in Oromia Special Zone, Central Ethiopia. Infect Genet Evol 2016;43:281-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.06.005

38. Nguyen ST, Fukuda Y, Nguyen DT, Tada C, Nakai Y. Prevalence and first genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in beef calves in Vietnam. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48:837-841 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1013-x

39. Zhang HJ, Song JK, Wu XM, Li YH, Wang Y, Lin Q, Zhao GH. First report of Giardia duodenalis genotypes in Zangxiang pigs from China. Parasitol Res 2019;118:2305-2310 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06340-8

40. Chen D, Zou Y, Li Z, Wang SS, Xie SC, Shi LQ, Zou FC, Yang JF, Zhao GH, Zhu XQ. Occurrence and multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in black-boned sheep and goats in southwestern China. Parasit Vectors 2019;12:102 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3367-1

41. Minetti C, Taweenan W, Hogg R, Featherstone C, Randle N, Latham SM, Wastling JM. Occurrence and diversity of Giardia duodenalis assemblages in livestock in the UK. Transbound Emerg Dis 2014;61:60-67 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12075

42. Xie SC, Zou Y, Chen D, Jiang MM, Yuan XD, Li Z, Zou FC, Yang JF, Sheng JL, Zhu XQ. Occurrence and Multilocus Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in Yunnan Black Goats in China. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:4601737. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4601737

43. Wang SS, Yuan YJ, Yin YL, Hu RS, Song JK, Zhao GH. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in pigs of Shaanxi Province, northwestern China. Parasit Vectors 2017;10:490 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2418-8

44. Roegner AF, Daniels ME, Smith WA, Gottdenker N, Schwartz LM, Liu J, Campbell A, Fiorello CV. Giardia infection and Trypanosoma cruzi exposure in dogs in the Bosawás biosphere reserve, Nicaragua. Ecohealth 2019;16:512-522 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-019-01434-2

45. Huang J, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhao J, Wang R, Jian F, Ning C, Zhang W, Zhang L. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in deer in Henan and Jilin, China. Parasit Vectors 2018;11:239 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2813-9

46. Cacciò SM, Beck R, Lalle M, Marinculic A, Pozio E. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis reveals striking differences between assemblages A and B. Int J Parasitol 2008;38:1523-1531 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.04.008

Fig. 1

A phylogenetic tree of Giardia lamblia tpi gene sequences. Novel subtypes of assemblage E isolates identified from cattle in this study are marked with a black square (■).

Fig. 2

A phylogenetic tree of Giardia lamblia on gdh gene sequences. The isolates marked with a black square (■) represent novel subtypes of assemblage identified from cattle in this study.

Table 1

Prevalence and factors associated with Giardia lamblia infection in cattle in Jiangxi Province, China

Variable	Category	No. tested	No. positive	% (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	P-value
Age	<1 month	5	0	0
	1–3 months	46	9	19.6 (8.10–31.03)	3.0 (1.27–7.07)	<0.05
	4–24 months	239	23	9.6 (5.88–13.36)	1.3 (0.70–2.45)	>0.05
	>24 months	266	20	7.5 (4.35–10.69)	Reference

Region	Nanchang	222	36	16.2 (11.37–21.06)	20.71 (2.80–153.20)	<0.05
	Gao’an	166	13	7.8 (3.74–11.92)	9.09 (1.17–70.54)
	Xinyu	108	1	0.9 (0–2.73)	Reference
	Ji’an	60	2	3.3 (0–7.88)	3.69 (0.33–41.56)	>0.05

breed	Dairy cattle	165	33	20.0 (13.90–26.10)	26.75 (3.60–198.79)	<0.05
	Beef cattle	283	18	6.4 (3.52–9.20)	7.27 (0.96–55.13)
	Buffalo	108	1	0.9 (0–2.73)	Reference

Total		566	52	9.2 (6.81–11.57)

Table 2

Intra-assemblage substitutions in bg, tpi, and gdh sequences from assemblage E

Subtype (number)	Nucleotide positions and substitutions					GenBank ID
bg
	54	159	261	303	402
Ref. sequence	T	A	T	C	T	MK252651
E1 (14)	T	A	T	C	T
E5 (9)	C	A	C	C	T
E8 (8)	C	A	C	C	C
E9 (8)	T	A	C	C	C
E11 (5)	T	G	C	C	C
E18 (2)	T	A	C	C	T
E41* (5)	T	A	C	T	T	MT123524

tpi
	92	179	251	339	476
Ref. sequence	A	A	G	A	G	KY633482
E1 (1)	T	A	T	T	G
E13 (1)	G	G	C	C	A
E17 (7)	T	G	C	C	A
E23 (2)	T	G	C	C	A
E38 (1)	T	G	C	C	A
E42* (5)	A	A	G	A	G	MT123527
E43* (2)	G	A	G	A	G	MT123528
E44* (1)	T	G	T	C	G	MT123529

gdh
	74	137	231	311	446
Ref. sequence	G	T	A	C	A	KY711410
E1 (7)	A	A	A	C	A
E2 (29)	A	A	G	C	A
E45* (4)	G	T	A	C	G	MT123525
E46* (1)	A	A	A	T	A	MT123526

^* indicate that subtypes have not been reported.

Table 3

Intra-assemblage substitutions in bg, tpi, and gdh sequences from assemblage A

Subtype (number)	Nucleotide positions and substitutions					GenBank ID
bg
	60	120	180	240	360
Ref. sequence	C	C	A	G	A	MK573339
A (1)	C	C	A	G	A

tpi
	60	120	180	240	516
Ref. sequence	G	A	G	A	C	HQ179652
A1 (2)	G	A	G	A	G

gdh
	120	180	240	360	480
Ref. sequence	C	C	G	C	C	EF507642
A1 (1)	C	C	G	C	C

Table 4

Multilocus characters of Giardia lamblia isolates based on sequences of bg, tpi, and gdh genes

Isolate	Subtype			No. sequence	MLG type
Isolate	bg	tpi	gdh	No. sequence	MLG type
HX1-24, SBN4-9	E5	E17	E2	2	MLGE1
HX1-29	E8	E17	E2	1	MLGE2
XH1-11	E5	E42	E2	1	MLGE3
XH1-12	E8	E42*	E45*	1	MLGE4
XH1-20, SBN5-27	E41*	E17	E2	2	MLGE5
SBN1-3	E18	E13	E2	1	MLGE6
SBN2-1	E11	E1	E2	1	MLGE7
SBN3-1, YFX-9	E5	E43*	E2	2	MLGE8
SBN3-3	E11	E44*	E2	1	MLGE9
SBN5-20	E11	E17	E1	1	MLGE10
SBN5-28	E9	E38	E2	1	MLGE11
SBN6-28	E2	E17	E1	1	MLGE12
YFJ-8	E1	E23	E45*	1	MLGE13
YFJ-9	E1	E42*	E2	1	MLGE14
HX1-21	E1	A1	E2	1	Mixed
HX1-8	A	A1	A1	1	MLGA1

^* Novel subtypes of assemblage E.